Advice from the experts.
Regulated Signage Does Not Mean Retrograde Signage
The downside to this practice is that the buildings can be historically protected and come with heritage-building restrictions. This means that any change—down to a doorknob replacement—has to get clearance first. Obviously, this can create timely and costly hurdles.
What was unexpected is that signage can be considered one of these hurdles. Many companies are surprised to find that despite their unique and historic choice of location, they still have to put up health and safety signage as dictated by laws such as the ADA.
That this should come as a surprise at all is a problem. It harkens back to the debate that signage companies should be involved in construction projects from the beginning stages—not as an afterthought.
Further, many companies think that required signage will clash with the look they are going for. But thanks to the many advances in signage materials and processes— such as photopolymer, thermoforming, etc.—the option to create signage that better fits a theme is a reality.
The bad rep that wayfinding, ADA, and other mandated signage still carries is unfair and uninformed. Required doesn’t always mean lacking in aesthetics.
So what do you think? Is there a way to increase awareness of how far signage has come—particularly government-regulated signs like ADA?
Please login first in order for you to submit comments